Skip Main Navigation

You are here:  Data Elements » Teachers » Highly Qualified Teacher Data » Highly Qualified Teachers: 2010-11 »

Low-Poverty Secondary Schools - Percent of Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers: 2010-11 1

The percentage of core academic classes in low-poverty secondary schools taught by teachers that were highly qualified. [More about...]

Skip to content
The user can use the Graphs and Tables tool to explore basic state data values for the selected Data Element. The user can use the Data Mapping tool to explore basic state data values state-by-state for the selected data element, color-coded by value. The user can use the Trend Lines tool to explore basic trends in a Data Element across academic years. The user can use the Conditional Analysis tool to explore one Data Element by another.    
View data table
Share
State Sort states in alphabetical ascending orderSort states in alphabetical descending order Value Sort states by data element value in ascending orderSort states by data element value in descending order
   050%100%
National View trend line for National 97%
US 97%
Alabama View trend line for Alabama 89%
AL 89%
Alaska View trend line for Alaska 92%
AK 92%
Arizona View trend line for Arizona 98%
AZ 98%
Arkansas View trend line for Arkansas 99%
AR 99%
California View trend line for California 92%
CA 92%
Colorado View trend line for Colorado 99%
CO 99%
Connecticut View trend line for Connecticut 100%
CT 100%
Delaware View trend line for Delaware 97%
DE 97%
District of Columbia View trend line for District of Columbia 84%
DC 84%
Florida View trend line for Florida 94%
FL 94%
Georgia View trend line for Georgia 99%
GA 99%
Hawaii View trend line for Hawaii 86%
HI 86%
Idaho View trend line for Idaho 97%
ID 97%
Illinois View trend line for Illinois 100%
IL 100%
Indiana View trend line for Indiana 97%
IN 97%
Iowa View trend line for Iowa 100%
IA 100%
Kansas View trend line for Kansas 98%
KS 98%
Kentucky View trend line for Kentucky 99%
KY 99%
LouisianaA View trend line for Louisiana 92%
LA 92%
Maine View trend line for Maine 99%
ME 99%
Maryland View trend line for Maryland 94%
MD 94%
Massachusetts View trend line for Massachusetts 99%
MA 99%
Michigan View trend line for Michigan 100%
MI 100%
Minnesota View trend line for Minnesota 99%
MN 99%
Mississippi View trend line for Mississippi 98%
MS 98%
Missouri View trend line for Missouri 98%
MO 98%
Montana View trend line for Montana 100%
MT 100%
Nebraska View trend line for Nebraska 100%
NE 100%
Nevada View trend line for Nevada 94%
NV 94%
New Hampshire View trend line for New Hampshire 99%
NH 99%
New Jersey View trend line for New Jersey 100%
NJ 100%
New Mexico View trend line for New Mexico 99%
NM 99%
New York View trend line for New York 100%
NY 100%
North Carolina View trend line for North Carolina 97%
NC 97%
North Dakota View trend line for North Dakota 100%
ND 100%
Ohio View trend line for Ohio 100%
OH 100%
Oklahoma View trend line for Oklahoma 100%
OK 100%
Oregon View trend line for Oregon 98%
OR 98%
Pennsylvania View trend line for Pennsylvania 99%
PA 99%
Puerto Rico View trend line for Puerto Rico 84%
PR 84%
Rhode Island View trend line for Rhode Island 97%
RI 97%
South Carolina View trend line for South Carolina 97%
SC 97%
South Dakota View trend line for South Dakota 100%
SD 100%
Tennessee View trend line for Tennessee 98%
TN 98%
Texas View trend line for Texas 100%
TX 100%
Utah View trend line for Utah 88%
UT 88%
Vermont View trend line for Vermont 98%
VT 98%
Virginia View trend line for Virginia 100%
VA 100%
Washington View trend line for Washington 99%
WA 99%
West Virginia View trend line for West Virginia 88%
WV 88%
Wisconsin View trend line for Wisconsin 99%
WI 99%
Wyoming View trend line for Wyoming 98%
WY 98%

Key
this symbol means not applicable.
- this symbol means data value was not available.
n< this symbol means that the data have been suppressed.
# this symbol means data value rounds to zero.
this symbol means reporting standards not met.
<3% this symbol means data value was less than 3%.
>97% this symbol means data value was greater than 97%.
 
   
   
 
 
   
1 Description: The percentage of core academic classes in low-poverty secondary schools taught by teachers that were highly qualified. ; Academic Year: 2010-11; Grade: N/A; Note: The state-reported percentage of core academic classes in low-poverty secondary schools taught by teachers that were highly qualified. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by NCLB, requires states to have a 'highly qualified teacher' in every classroom. Under ESEA, a highly qualified teacher is one who (1) has a bachelor's degree, (2) has full state certification or licensure, and (3) has demonstrated subject matter competency in the subject they teach. Low-poverty schools are defined under Section 1111(h)(1)(c)(viii) of ESEA as schools in the bottom poverty quartile in the state. Core academic classes include English, reading/language arts, mathematics, science, foreign languages, civics and government, economics, arts, history, and geography. A dash (-) indicates that the data are not available. ; Source: EDFacts/Consolidated State Performance Report, 2010-11: http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/consolidated/index.html; Data Uploaded On: 10/23/2012 

LA: In Louisana’s data submission, they reversed the data for high and low poverty schools. They did not resubmit, but confirmed via an e-mail to the Department that the data were incorrect and that the numbers were reversed. These data reflect what the state submitted to the Department.