This Department of Education website is not fully compliant with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. The Department is currently remediating all non-compliant components. In the interim, please contact EDDataExpress@ed.gov for alternative means to interact with this website.

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the collection and reporting of data on EDE, beginning in SY 2019-20. The Department urges abundant caution when using the data and recommends reviewing the relevant data notes prior to use or interpretation. This includes data on state assessments, graduation rates, and chronic absenteeism.

Program
Educators

Percent of teachers who are identified as inexperienced as defined by the state

Caution! States often vary significantly in their implementation, data definitions, and/or measures used to report on federal grant programs. Comparing data across states can lead to misinterpretation.

Map instructions: Use left and right arrows to navigate through the states/districts, which are ordered alphabetically. Use Enter to zoom into dustrict level data for current state. Use Tab key to exit map.
Zoom-Out

(Note: Because states use different definitions, making comparisons across states can lead to incorrect conclusions.)

EDFACTS File Specifications 203 and 067

Map Data Notes
Displaying 7 - 9 of 117 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2019-2020 ARKANSAS 203 839 Staffing Year to Year Comparison: The total number of teachers by inexperienced or emergency credential status (Category Set B) changed by 10% or more between the prior year and current year.
2019-2020 DELAWARE 067 422 Staffing Outside Expected Range: The percentage of not fully certified or licensed Title III teachers is greater than or equal to 20%. Due to increased funding additonal Delaware educators are seeking additional certification as Teacher of English learners.
2019-2020 NEW MEXICO 203 839 Staffing Year to Year Comparison: The total number of teachers changed by more than 5% between the prior year and current year. Data is accurate as reported and Year to Year change is attributed to COVID-19.
United States
10736

Title II Allocation of Funds

Share and percent of funds for different Title II activities

Source: Title II-A Use of Funds District Survey (EDE File Specifications T2USESHR AND T2USEPCT)

Title II Types of Professional Development (PD)

Of districts funding [Subject] PD, percent by type of PD

Source:  Title II-A Use of Funds District Survey (EDE File Specification T2DTYPE)

Title II Topics of Professional Development (PD)

Of districts funding [Subject] PD, percent by topic of PD

Source: Title II-A Use of Funds District Survey (EDE File Specification T2PDTOP)

Data Dictionary

Displaying 7 - 9 of 32


Filter by relevant graph
Relevant Graph Type of information Reference Term Description
Title II Allocation of Funds, Title II PD Types, Title II PD Topics Variable/Category Definition Professional development As defined in the ESEA, professional development is “sustained (not stand-alone, 1 day, or short term workshops), intensive, collaborative, job-embedded, data-driven, and classroom focused.
Title II Allocation of Funds Variable/Category Definition Percent of LEAs that used Title II Funds "Percent of LEAS that used Title II funds" provides data on the percentage of districts that reported in the district survey that they used Title II funds for the particular activity. The total across all categories will be above 100%. Percentages are based on districts with Title II-A funding available after transfers to and from other programs.
Title II Allocation of Funds Variable/Category Definition Share of Funds "Share of funds" provides data on the aggregate distribution of funds as reported by LEAs in the district survey. The total across all categories should equal 100%. Percentages are based on districts with Title II-A funding available after transfers to and from other programs.