Homeless Enrolled Students by State
SEA Source: EDFacts File Specification 118
LEA Source: EDFacts File Specifications 118, 170, and U.S. Census Bureau SAIPE Program
Map Data Notes
School Year | State | File Spec | Data Group | Data Topic | Data Note | State Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022-2023 | VIRGINIA | 118 | 655 | Participation | Year to Year comparison: SEA data reported in FS118 show a change of 0.001% between prior year and current year for migrant students. | Despite a significant year to year increase, the total enrolled is still lower than pre-pandemic counts. The state coordinator reviewed multiple years of child count data by LEA and contacted all liaisons for explanations where there was a significant discrepancy from the previous year that was not the result of a return (or movement toward) pre-pandemic levels. Most changes from 2021-22 fell into this category. Additional reasons provided by liaisons included increased awareness resulting from staff training, loss of employment opportunities in the community, lack of affordable housing, increases in evictions and high rents. The increase in the count for students experiencing homelessness with disabilities is consistent with the overall child count increase. The number of migratory students overall has decreased in Virginia as more workers are young men without children. |
2022-2023 | INDIANA | 118, 178 | 655 | Participation | The count of Homeless Students Enrolled in one or more of grades 9-12 was less than the sum of students reported as homeless in Academic Achievement in Reading/Language Arts in that grade. This applies to 14 LEAs. | In FS118, students homeless status is reported as identified by the LEA. In FS178, students are identified demographically as homeless or not (if any LEA reported them), so students could be in the homeless demographic group and show up in FS178 but not reported by the specific LEA in FS118. |
2022-2023 | CALIFORNIA | 118 | 655 | Participation | The sums of Homeless Students Enrolled Unaccompanied Youth and Unaccompanied Youth by Primary Nighttime Residence were not equal. | The California Department of Education (CDE) acknowledges this difference in total counts at the SEA level. A few unaccompanied youth reported to the CDE did not include a primary nighttime residence. |
Funding
Program funding over time
Performance
Proficiency gap between all students and homeless enrolled students in [Subject]
Source: EDFacts File Specification 175 & 178; Data Group 583 & 584