This Department of Education website is not fully compliant with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. The Department is currently remediating all non-compliant components. In the interim, please contact EDDataExpress@ed.gov for alternative means to interact with this website.

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the collection and reporting of data on EDE, beginning in SY 2019-20. The Department urges abundant caution when using the data and recommends reviewing the relevant data notes prior to use or interpretation. This includes data on state assessments, graduation rates, and chronic absenteeism.

View Data in the Data Download Tool

Click here to view graphs and charts for Funding, Participation, and Performance Data
Program
McKinney-Vento Act

Homeless Enrolled Students by State

Zoom-Out
Percentage of Homeless Students

SEA Source: EDFacts File Specification 118

LEA Source: EDFacts File Specifications 118, 170, and U.S. Census Bureau SAIPE Program

Map Data Notes
Displaying 1 - 3 of 43 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2018-2019 RHODE ISLAND 170 754 Status The number of LEAs with subgrants changed by -100% between SY 2017-18 (5 LEAs) and SY 2018-19 (0 LEAs).
2018-2019 NEW HAMPSHIRE 118 655 Participation The total number of homeless children and youth changed by more than 10% between SY2017-18 and SY2018-19.
2018-2019 VERMONT 118 655 Participation The total number of homeless children and youth changed by more than 10% between SY2017-18 and SY2018-19. SY1718 was the first year of implementation of the VT SLDS and the first year of collecting and reporting homeless data based on student level data. Homeless counts were lower than normal that year - the prior 2 years when the data was collected in an aggregate method by SU, homeless counts had been nearly 1100 (note - this was an unduplicated count). For the SY1819 data collection data, in an attempt to get more accurate homeless data, VTAOE Federal Program's staff encouraged the homeless liasons to communicate more directly with the school registrars and data managers reporting data through the SLDS. We attribute this disparity between SY1718 and SY1819 to improved practices of Vermont LEAs in identifying and reporting these students, as well as increases in this population driven by shifts in various domestic, economic and societal factors.
United States
337

Funding

Program funding over time

Participation

Number of homeless enrolled students by primary nighttime residence over time.

Note: In tooltip table, “Total” indicates total students who reported primary night time residence

Source: EDFacts File Specification 118; Data Group 655

Performance

Proficiency between all students and homeless enrolled students in [Subject]

Source: EDFacts File Specification 175; Data Group 583

Data Notes
Displaying 1 - 3 of 34 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2018-2019 BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION 118 655 Participation The total number of HCY reported at the LEA level is equal to or less than the total number of HCY reported at the SEA level in Category Set A (Student Count by Age/Grade).
2018-2019 NEW HAMPSHIRE 118 655 Participation The total number of homeless children and youth changed by more than 10% between SY2017-18 and SY2018-19.
2018-2019 VERMONT 118 655 Participation The total number of homeless children and youth changed by more than 10% between SY2017-18 and SY2018-19. SY1718 was the first year of implementation of the VT SLDS and the first year of collecting and reporting homeless data based on student level data. Homeless counts were lower than normal that year - the prior 2 years when the data was collected in an aggregate method by SU, homeless counts had been nearly 1100 (note - this was an unduplicated count). For the SY1819 data collection data, in an attempt to get more accurate homeless data, VTAOE Federal Program's staff encouraged the homeless liasons to communicate more directly with the school registrars and data managers reporting data through the SLDS. We attribute this disparity between SY1718 and SY1819 to improved practices of Vermont LEAs in identifying and reporting these students, as well as increases in this population driven by shifts in various domestic, economic and societal factors.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 59 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2018-2019 TENNESSEE 178 584 Performance The number of valid test takers in grade 11 in SY2018-19 is greater than the number of valid test takers in grade 12 in SY2017-18 by approximately 13 percent. This difference was not observed in FS188/DG589.
2018-2019 ILLINOIS 175, 178, 185, 188 583, 584, 588, 589 Performance The sum of students reported at the LEA- and School-level is less than the SEA-level. The difference between the students taking the alternate assessment based on alternate achievement standards at the SEA-level compared to the LEA- and School-level is approximately 10 percent.
2018-2019 MASSACHUSETTS 175, 185 583, 588 Performance The number of valid test takers does not equal the number of participants. These numbers are expected to equal. At the SEA-level, the difference in military connected students is approximately 16 percent, the difference in foster care students is approximately 36 percent, and the difference in English learners is approximately 13 percent. These data are accurate. The reason Massachusetts reported a different number of students in the participation files (N185/ N189) than were reflected in our assessment files (N175/N179) is due to first year ELL students. The ELL students participate in MCAS exam, but may not receive a valid score. This process helps to familiarize ELL students with the test. If the student receives a proficient score or better they receive a valid score; if they do not receive a proficient score, they are flagged as 1st year ELL students and considered as participating. This explanation would also account for all of the discrepancies reported for students in subgroups.