This Department of Education website is not fully compliant with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. The Department is currently remediating all non-compliant components. In the interim, please contact EDDataExpress@ed.gov for alternative means to interact with this website.

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the collection and reporting of data on EDE, beginning in SY 2019-20. The Department urges abundant caution when using the data and recommends reviewing the relevant data notes prior to use or interpretation. This includes data on state assessments, graduation rates, and chronic absenteeism.

Program
Title I, Part C

Eligible migratory students served by type of service

State does not have a Migrant Education Program or data for that state are not available.

Source: EDFacts File Specifications 054, 121, 145; Data Groups 102, 634, 684

Diagram Data Notes
Displaying 4 - 6 of 33 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note
2016-2017, 2015-2016, 2014-2015, 2013-2014, 2012-2013, 2011-2012, 2010-2011 US, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 054, 121, 122, 145 102, 634, 635, 684 Participation District of Columbia did not receive Title I, Part C funds. 
2016-2017, 2015-2016, 2014-2015, 2013-2014, 2012-2013, 2011-2012, 2010-2011 US, PUERTO RICO 121, 122, 145 102, 634, 635, 684 Participation Puerto Rico did not receive Title I, Part C funds. 
2016-2017, 2015-2016, 2014-2015, 2013-2014, 2012-2013, 2011-2012 US, WEST VIRGINIA 054, 121, 122, 145 102, 634, 635, 684 Participation West Virginia did not receive Title I, Part C funds.
Percentage of Eligible Students that are Eligible and Served by the Migrant Education Program
United States
337

Funding

Program funding over time

Participation

Number of eligible and served migratory students over time

Source: EDFacts File Specifications 054, 121; Data Groups 102, 634

Performance

Proficiency gap between all students and migratory students by [Subject]

Source:  EDFacts File Specifications 175 & 178; Data Group 583 & 584

Funding, Participation and Performance Data Notes
Displaying 4 - 6 of 30 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note
2016-2017, 2015-2016, 2014-2015, 2013-2014, 2012-2013, 2011-2012, 2010-2011 US, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 054, 121, 122, 145 102, 634, 635, 684 Participation District of Columbia did not receive Title I, Part C funds. 
2016-2017, 2015-2016, 2014-2015, 2013-2014, 2012-2013, 2011-2012, 2010-2011 US, PUERTO RICO 121, 122, 145 102, 634, 635, 684 Participation Puerto Rico did not receive Title I, Part C funds. 
2016-2017, 2015-2016, 2014-2015, 2013-2014, 2012-2013, 2011-2012 US, WEST VIRGINIA 054, 121, 122, 145 102, 634, 635, 684 Participation West Virginia did not receive Title I, Part C funds.
Displaying 4 - 6 of 20 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2016-2017 MASSACHUSETTS 175 583 Performance Massachusetts changed its regular assessments for grades 3 through 8 between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17. As a result, the State's SY2016-17 results are not comparable to prior years.
2016-2017 MISSISSIPPI 175 583 Performance Mississippi made the following changes to its alternate assessments for all grades between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17: (1) Changed cut scores, (2) Changed proficiency standards, (3) Significantly changed assessment items, and (4) Used entirely new assessment. As a result, the State's SY2016-17 results are not comparable to prior years.
2016-2017 NEBRASKA 175 583 Performance Nebraska made the following changes to its regular assessments for high school between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17: (1) Changed cut scores, (2) Changed proficiency standards, (3) Significantly changed assessment items, and (4) Used entirely new assessment. As a result, the State's SY2016-17 results are not comparable to prior years. Nebraska starting using the ACT assessment instead of state developed assessment in 2017.