Percentage of Students Who Graduated With a Regular High School Diploma
Source: EDFacts File Specifications 150 and 151
Map Data Notes
School Year | State | File Spec | Data Group | Data Topic | Data Note | State Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020-2021 | ALASKA | 150, 151 | 695, 696 | Performance | Prior Year Count Comparison (LEA): Submitted data indicated that the ALL STUDENTS cohort count (grand total) changed by more than 10% and 50 students or more from SY 2019-20 to SY 2020-21 for 1 LEA that have a cohort count of 250 students or more. While this may be correct, this is a larger change than we would typically expect to see. | The enrollment increased due to students transferring to the school district's statewide correspondence school, Raven, as a result of school closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic. |
2020-2021 | ALASKA | 150, 151 | 695, 696 | Performance | Prior Year Count Comparison (SEA): Submitted data indicated that the total cohort count (grand total) changed by more than 10% (and more than 250 students) from SY 2019-20 to SY 2020-21 for the following subgroups: ECODIS. Discrepancies by subgroup: -ECODIS: -421 students, or -10.58% While this may be correct, this is a larger change than we would typically expect to see. | The Department's ability to detect economic disadvantaged status was impacted by the lack of National School Lunch Program data due to the pandemic. |
2020-2021 | ALASKA | 150, 151 | 695, 696 | Performance | Prior Year Rate Comparison (LEA): The SY 2020-21 Four-Year grand total graduation rate is higher/lower by 3 percentage points or more than the SY 2019-20 Four-Year graduation rate in 1 LEA containing 500 students or more. While this may be correct, this is a larger change than we would typically expect to see. | The State indicated data are accurate as reported. |
Funding
Program funding over time
Participation
Number of students in school wide and targeted assistance programs by race/ethnicity over time
Source: EDFacts File Specification 037; Data Group 548
Performance
Proficiency gap between economically disadvantaged and non-economically disadvantaged students by [Subject]
Source: EDFacts File Specification 175, 178 & 179; Data Group 583, 584 & 585