Percentage of Students Who Graduated With a Regular High School Diploma
Source: EDFacts File Specifications 150 and 151
Map Data Notes
School Year | State | File Spec | Data Group | Data Topic | Data Note | State Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020-2021 | KENTUCKY | 150, 151 | 695, 696 | Performance | Prior Year Rate Comparison (SEA): The SY 2020-21 Four-Year graduation rate is higher/lower by 3 percentage points or more than the SY 2019-20 Four-Year graduation rate for the following subgroups with total cohort counts of 500 students or more: HOM. Discrepancies by subgroup: - HOM: -4.45% | The State indicated data are accurate as reported. |
2020-2021 | LOUISIANA | 150, 151 | 695, 696 | Performance | SEA to LEA Comparison: The SEA 4-Year Total Cohort Count is different from the aggregated LEA Total Cohort Count, when aggregated to the ALL, ECODIS, FCS, HOM, LEP, MA, MB, MHL, MM, MW, CWD subgroups. Differences between SEA and LEA (by subgroup): - ALL: 2495 students, or 5.08%, - ECODIS: 1830 students, or 5.65%, - FCS: 28 students, or 28%, - HOM: 182 students, or 20.38%, - LEP: 86 students, or 7.24%, - MA: 28 students, or 3.17%, - MB: 1239 students, or 5.85%, - MHL: 206 students, or 6.51%, - MM: 69 students, or 7.45%, - MW: 930 students, or 4.12%, - CWD: 257 students, or 5.19% | |
2020-2021 | LOUISIANA | 150, 151 | 695, 696 | Performance | SEA to SCH Comparison: The SEA 4-Year Total Cohort Count is different from the aggregated SCH Total Cohort Count, when aggregated to the ALL, ECODIS, FCS, HOM, LEP, MA, MAN, MB, MHL, MM, MW, CWD subgroups. Differences between SEA and SCH (by subgroup): - ALL: 3329 students, or 6.78%, - ECODIS: 2454 students, or 7.57%, - FCS: 35 students, or 35%, - HOM: 211 students, or 23.63%, - LEP: 107 students, or 9.01%, - MA: 34 students, or 3.85%, - MAN: 38 students, or 10.86%, - MB: 1589 students, or 7.5%, - MHL: 271 students, or 8.57%, - MM: 92 students, or 9.94%, - MW: 1297 students, or 5.75%, - CWD: 335 students, or 6.77% |
Funding
Program funding over time
Performance
Proficiency gap between economically disadvantaged and non-economically disadvantaged students by [Subject]
Source: EDFacts File Specification 175, 178 & 179; Data Group 583, 584 & 585