This Department of Education website is not fully compliant with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. The Department is currently remediating all non-compliant components. In the interim, please contact EDDataExpress@ed.gov for alternative means to interact with this website.

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the collection and reporting of data on EDE, beginning in SY 2019-20. The Department urges abundant caution when using the data and recommends reviewing the relevant data notes prior to use or interpretation. This includes data on state assessments, graduation rates, and chronic absenteeism.

View Data in the Data Download Tool

Click here to view graphs and charts for Funding, Participation, and Performance Data
Program
Title I, Part D, Subpart 2

Number of Students Served in Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 Programs by Program Type

Zoom-Out

Number of students served

Source: EDFacts File Specifications 127 and Data Group 657

Map Data Notes
Displaying 13 - 15 of 75 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2020-2021 CALIFORNIA 127 657 Participation Year to Year Comparison: The sum of the unduplicated counts of students reported in Subtotal 1 at the LEA-level in FS126/DG657 changed by 50 percent or more between the prior year and current year for the following program type: NEGLECT . The data are accurate. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, institutions experienced a significant drop in neglected student counts.
2020-2021 COLORADO 127 657 Participation Year to Year Comparison: The SEA-level data indicate a change of -57.1% between the current school year number of long-term students who showed improvement of up to one full grade level or more on mathematics pre- and post- test and the prior school year number of long-term students who showed improvement of up to one full grade level or more on mathematics pre- and post- test for the following N or D Programs (Subpart 1): ADLTCORR. The data are accurate as reported. CO reported NEGLECT and JUVDET as program types for the first time in 2020/21. Additionally, CO did not report the ATRISK program type in 2020/21. Due to the added JUVDET program type for some LEAs in 2020/21, the JUVCORR program type counts for those LEAs decreased as expected.
2020-2021 CONNECTICUT 180, 181, 127 782, 784, 657 Participation In 1 LEA(s), the sum of students reported as Obtained high school diploma in FS180/DG782 and FS181/DG784 is greater than the total unduplicated student count reported in Subtotal 1 of FS127/DG657 for the following Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 program types: JUVDET. These outcomes should be reported only once per student. According to our records, there were no students reported for one of the LEAs.
United States
337

Funding

Program funding over time

Participation

Percentage of students in programs funded by Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 by race/ethnicity and program type

 

 

Source: EDFacts File Specification 127; Data Group 657

Performance

Number of long-term students showing improvement in [Subject] by program type

 

Source: EDFacts File Specification 127; Data Group 657

Funding, Participation, and Performance Data Notes
Displaying 13 - 15 of 75 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2020-2021 CALIFORNIA 127 657 Participation Year to Year Comparison: The sum of the unduplicated counts of students reported in Subtotal 1 at the LEA-level in FS126/DG657 changed by 50 percent or more between the prior year and current year for the following program type: NEGLECT . The data are accurate. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, institutions experienced a significant drop in neglected student counts.
2020-2021 COLORADO 127 657 Participation Year to Year Comparison: The SEA-level data indicate a change of -57.1% between the current school year number of long-term students who showed improvement of up to one full grade level or more on mathematics pre- and post- test and the prior school year number of long-term students who showed improvement of up to one full grade level or more on mathematics pre- and post- test for the following N or D Programs (Subpart 1): ADLTCORR. The data are accurate as reported. CO reported NEGLECT and JUVDET as program types for the first time in 2020/21. Additionally, CO did not report the ATRISK program type in 2020/21. Due to the added JUVDET program type for some LEAs in 2020/21, the JUVCORR program type counts for those LEAs decreased as expected.
2020-2021 CONNECTICUT 180, 181, 127 782, 784, 657 Participation In 1 LEA(s), the sum of students reported as Obtained high school diploma in FS180/DG782 and FS181/DG784 is greater than the total unduplicated student count reported in Subtotal 1 of FS127/DG657 for the following Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 program types: JUVDET. These outcomes should be reported only once per student. According to our records, there were no students reported for one of the LEAs.
Displaying 13 - 15 of 67 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2020-2021 INDIANA 125, 127 629, 657 Performance Across File Comparison: In 1 LEA(s), the total number of long-term students served (Category Set F) reported at the LEA-level in FS127/DG657 is less than the sum of students with pre- and post- test results for reading/language arts (Category Set A) reported at the LEA-level in FS125/DG629.
2020-2021 INDIANA 125 629 Performance In 1 LEA(s), no data or all zeros were reported for the sum of students with pre- and post-test results in reading/language arts for the following N or D Programs (Subpart 2): JUVDET. One LEA does not conduct post testing as it is much too fluid of an environment and have found that collecting and analyzing previous student records is more effective than using the NWEA assesssment when the student is placed. There is no data to report for this LEA.
2020-2021 INDIANA 125 629 Performance In 2 LEA(s), no data or all zeros were reported for the sum of students with pre- and post-test results in mathematics for the following N or D Programs (Subpart 2): JUVDET. One LEA does not conduct post testing as it is much too fluid of an environment and have found that collecting and analyzing previous student records is more effective than using the NWEA assesssment when the student is placed. There is no data to report for this LEA. Another LEA did not retain year end data this year due to a miscommunication with state assessment, but has assured the IDOE they will next year.