New ED Data Express is coming. Share your input in this short survey.

You are here:  Data Elements » Accountability Data » Schools in Improvement » Schools in Need of Improvement: 2010-11 »

Number of Schools in Improvement, Year 2: 2010-11 1

The number of Title I schools in the state that have missed adequate yearly progress (AYP) for three consecutive years. [More about...]

Skip to content
The user can use the Graphs and Tables tool to explore basic state data values for the selected Data Element. The user can use the Data Mapping tool to explore basic state data values state-by-state for the selected data element, color-coded by value.    
View data table

Data Mapping Number of Schools in Improvement, Year 2: 2010-11

U.S. Map Legend
Less than the lower bound number
Within the range
Greater than the upper bound

Not applicable, not available, or suppressed
  • Use the mapping tool to view state by state data on a specific data element, color-coded by value.
  • Select the range of values that you want to see by using your mouse to drag the handles on the slider bar; OR
  • Enter lower and upper bounds in the boxes provided and select "GO" to see the values displayed on the map.
  • Scroll down to see the actual values for each highlighted state.
Left range handle is at 2
Right range handle is at 614

51 (98.1%) states are within the specified range

Key
this symbol means state data value was within the range.
< this symbol means state data value was less than the lower bound number.
> this symbol means state data value was greater than the upper bound number.
  An empty cell means state data value was not applicable, not available, or suppressed.
this symbol means not applicable.
- this symbol means data value was not available.
n< this symbol means that the data have been suppressed.
# this symbol means data value rounds to zero.
this symbol means reporting standards not met.
 
   
   
 
 
   
1 Description: The number of Title I schools in the state that have missed adequate yearly progress (AYP) for three consecutive years.; Academic Year: 2010-11; Grade: N/A; Note: The state-reported number of Title I schools that have missed adequate yearly progress (AYP) for three consecutive years. This is the second stage of the five improvement phases outlined under Section 1116 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Schools in this category must offer public school choice and supplemental educational services (SES). Improvement statuses are projected based on the school's AYP status from the prior school year (e.g. 2010-11 improvement statuses are based on 2009-10 AYP determinations).; Source: EDFacts/Consolidated State Performance Report, 2009-10: http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/consolidated/index.html; Data Uploaded On: 02/27/2012 

IN: Indiana uses a differentiated accountability model that cannot be mapped back to the standard five improvement statuses, so they cannot report these data.