This Department of Education website is not fully compliant with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. The Department is currently remediating all non-compliant components. In the interim, please contact EDDataExpress@ed.gov for alternative means to interact with this website.

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the collection and reporting of data on EDE, beginning in SY 2019-20. The Department urges abundant caution when using the data and recommends reviewing the relevant data notes prior to use or interpretation. This includes data on state assessments, graduation rates, and chronic absenteeism.

View Data in the Data Download Tool

Click here to view graphs and charts for Funding, Participation, and Performance Data
Program
Title I, Part C

Eligible migratory students served by type of service

State does not have a Migrant Education Program or data for that state are not available.

Source: EDFacts File Specifications 054, 121, 145; Data Groups 102, 634, 684

Diagram Data Notes
Displaying 19 - 21 of 33 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2016-2017 NEVADA 121 634 Participation The number of eligible migratory students decreased by 10 percent or more between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17. Nevada has verified the data and is correct as reported.  There was a substantial decrease in the Migrant population for one of our LEAs.
2016-2017 NEW HAMPSHIRE 121 634 Participation The number of eligible migratory students decreased by 10 percent or more between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17. For the past couple years, we were able to have a recruiter (from another state) come in for several weekends to assist us in recruiting.  This past year, we were unable to have that recruiter (from another state) because of new restrictions that we had in our state government regarding hiring contractors.  This explains the decrease in the numbers.  As a small state small changes result in more than a 10% change.
2016-2017 NEW MEXICO 121 634 Participation The number of eligible migratory students increased by 10 percent or more between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17. There was an increase in the total because of a change from a school based recruiting model to a regional based recruiting model. This meant that there were recruiters working during the summer as well as after normal work hours during the school year. There has been a intentional focus on improving identification and recruitment in every phase and person working in our districts that have migrant programs.
Percentage of Eligible Students that are Eligible and Served by the Migrant Education Program
United States
337

Funding

Program funding over time

Participation

Number of eligible and served migratory students over time

Source: EDFacts File Specifications 054, 121; Data Groups 102, 634

Performance

Proficiency gap between all students and migratory students by [Subject]

Source:  EDFacts File Specifications 175 & 178; Data Group 583 & 584

Funding, Participation and Performance Data Notes
Displaying 19 - 21 of 30 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2016-2017 NEVADA 121 634 Participation The number of eligible migratory students decreased by 10 percent or more between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17. Nevada has verified the data and is correct as reported.  There was a substantial decrease in the Migrant population for one of our LEAs.
2016-2017 NEW HAMPSHIRE 121 634 Participation The number of eligible migratory students decreased by 10 percent or more between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17. For the past couple years, we were able to have a recruiter (from another state) come in for several weekends to assist us in recruiting.  This past year, we were unable to have that recruiter (from another state) because of new restrictions that we had in our state government regarding hiring contractors.  This explains the decrease in the numbers.  As a small state small changes result in more than a 10% change.
2016-2017 NEW MEXICO 121 634 Participation The number of eligible migratory students increased by 10 percent or more between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17. There was an increase in the total because of a change from a school based recruiting model to a regional based recruiting model. This meant that there were recruiters working during the summer as well as after normal work hours during the school year. There has been a intentional focus on improving identification and recruitment in every phase and person working in our districts that have migrant programs.
Displaying 19 - 20 of 20 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note
2016-2017 PENNSYLVANIA 178 584 Performance Pennsylvania made the following changes to its alternate assessments for all grades between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17: (1) Changed cut scores, (2) Changed proficiency standards, and (3) Realigned assessment to new content standards. As a result, the State's SY2016-17 results are not comparable to prior years.
2016-2017 SOUTH CAROLINA 178 584 Performance South Carolina made the following changes to its regular assessments for high school between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17: (1) Changed cut scores and (2) Changed proficiency standards. South Carolina changed its regular assessments for grades 3 through 8 between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17. As a result, the State's SY2016-17 results are not comparable to prior years.