This Department of Education website is not fully compliant with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. The Department is currently remediating all non-compliant components. In the interim, please contact EDDataExpress@ed.gov for alternative means to interact with this website.

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the collection and reporting of data on EDE, beginning in SY 2019-20. The Department urges abundant caution when using the data and recommends reviewing the relevant data notes prior to use or interpretation. This includes data on state assessments, graduation rates, and chronic absenteeism.

Program
Title I, Part A

Percentage of Students Who Graduated With a Regular High School Diploma

Map instructions: Use left and right arrows to navigate through the states/districts, which are ordered alphabetically. Use Enter to zoom into dustrict level data for current state. Use Tab key to exit map.
Zoom-Out

Percentage

Source: EDFacts File Specifications 150 and 151

Map Data Notes
Displaying 22 - 24 of 234 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2020-2021 CALIFORNIA 150, 151 695, 696 Performance Prior Year Rate Comparison (LEA): The SY 2020-21 Four-Year grand total graduation rate is higher/lower by 3 percentage points or more than the SY 2019-20 Four-Year graduation rate in 58 LEAs containing 500 students or more. Note: The list below only includes the first 25 LEAs identified. Please contact EDFacts for a complete list of LEAs identified. While this may be correct, this is a larger change than we would typically expect to see. The State indicated data are accurate as reported.
2020-2021 CALIFORNIA 150, 151 695, 696 Performance Prior Year Rate Comparison (SEA): The SY 2020-21 Four-Year graduation rate is higher/lower by 3 percentage points or more than the SY 2019-20 Four-Year graduation rate for the following subgroups with total cohort counts of 500 students or more: MB, MM. Discrepancies by subgroup: - MB: -4.41% - MM: 4.81% The State indicated data are accurate as reported.
2020-2021 COLORADO 150, 151 695, 696 Performance Prior Year Count Comparison (LEA): Submitted data indicated that the ALL STUDENTS cohort count (grand total) changed by more than 10% and 50 students or more from SY 2019-20 to SY 2020-21 for 5 LEAs that have a cohort count of 250 students or more. While this may be correct, this is a larger change than we would typically expect to see. One LEA had a significant population increase between 2019-20 and 2020-21, which increased the quantity of 12th grade students who were eligible to graduate, thereby increasing the count of graduates. The majority of the population increase took place at the online school within this district, which appears to be in response to COVID. One LEA had a significant population increase in 12th grade, which meant there were more students eligible to graduate that did graduate. They also had a higher count of 5 year graduates, which indicates several students didn't graduate on time due to COVID. Two LEAs had a significant increase in 12th grade students which meant there were more eligible students to graduate that did graduate in 2020-2021. One LEA had a significant decrease in 12th grade students, which meant there were less students eligible to graduate in 2020-2021.
United States
337

Funding

Program funding over time

Participation

Number of students in school wide and targeted assistance programs by race/ethnicity over time

Source:  EDFacts File Specification 037; Data Group 548

Performance

Proficiency gap between economically disadvantaged and non-economically disadvantaged students by [Subject]

 

Source:  EDFacts File Specification 175, 178 & 179; Data Group 583, 584 & 585

Funding, Participation and Performance Data Notes
Displaying 22 - 24 of 87 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2020-2021 MINNESOTA 037 548 Participation Year to Year Comparison: The SEA data indicate a change of -30.1% between the current school year and the prior school year number of homeless students participating and served by Title I, Part A schoolwide programs and targeted assistance programs (Category Set E).
2020-2021 MONTANA 037 548 Participation Year to Year Comparison: The SEA data indicate a change of 201.4% between the current school year and the prior school year number of homeless students participating and served by Title I, Part A schoolwide programs and targeted assistance programs (Category Set E).
2020-2021 NEBRASKA 037 548 Participation Year to Year Comparison: The SEA data indicate a change of -34.8% between the current school year and the prior school year number of homeless students participating and served by Title I, Part A schoolwide programs and targeted assistance programs (Category Set E). Due to Covid the number of Homeless students in Nebraska reported changed signifcantly from previous years
Displaying 22 - 24 of 269 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note
2020-2021 DELAWARE 175, 178, 185, 188 583, 584, 588, 589 Performance Across file comparison [MATHEMATICS and READING/LANGUAGE ARTS]: The FS175 SEA number of students in the LEP, ECODIS subgroup(s) who took a(n) ALL, REGASSWACC, REGASSWOACC assessment and received a valid score for GRADE(S) ALL, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, HS does not equal the FS185 number of students who participated in the assessment. The discrepancies range from 133 to 11639 students, or 100.00%. Similar discrepancies exist for FS178/FS188.
2020-2021 DELAWARE 175, 178, 185, 188 583, 584, 588, 589 Performance Across file comparison [MATHEMATICS and READING/LANGUAGE ARTS]: The FS175 and FS178 SEA number of students in the ECODIS subgroup(s) who took a(n) ALTASSALTACH assessment and received a valid score for GRADE(S) ALL does not equal the FS185 and FS188 number of students who participated in the assessment. The discrepancy is 205 students, or 100.00%.
2020-2021 DELAWARE 175, 178, 185, 188 583, 584, 588, 589 Performance Across file comparison [MATHEMATICS and READING/LANGUAGE ARTS]: The FS175 and FS178 LEA and SCH number of students in the MIG subgroup(s) who took a(n) ALL, REGASSWACC assessment and received a valid score for GRADE(S) ALL were not reported, however the FS185 and FS188 number of students who participated in an assessment were reported.