This Department of Education website is not fully compliant with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. The Department is currently remediating all non-compliant components. In the interim, please contact EDDataExpress@ed.gov for alternative means to interact with this website.

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the collection and reporting of data on EDE, beginning in SY 2019-20. The Department urges abundant caution when using the data and recommends reviewing the relevant data notes prior to use or interpretation. This includes data on state assessments, graduation rates, and chronic absenteeism.

View Data in the Data Download Tool

Click here to view graphs and charts for Funding, Participation, and Performance Data
Program
Educators

Percent of teachers who are identified as inexperienced as defined by the state

Caution! States often vary significantly in their implementation, data definitions, and/or measures used to report on federal grant programs. Comparing data across states can lead to misinterpretation.
Zoom-Out

(Note: Because states use different definitions, making comparisons across states can lead to incorrect conclusions.)

EDFACTS File Specifications 203 and 067

Map Data Notes
Displaying 1 - 3 of 117 data notes
School Year State File Spec Data Group Data Topic Data Note State Note
2019-2020 LOUISIANA 067 422 Staffing A difference of at least 20% exists in the number of LEAs included in this file between the prior year and the current year. Louisana had an increase in number of LEAs due to expansion of several Title III consortiums. This data is accurate.
2019-2020 IDAHO 067 422 Staffing Year to Year Comparison: The number of fully certified or licensed Title III teachers changed by more than 25% between the prior year and the current year. In SY1920, we are more accurately capturing the FTE of teachers providing EL services with the addition of the EL Support assignment code.
2019-2020 ILLINOIS 067 422 Staffing Year to Year Comparison: The number of fully certified or licensed Title III teachers changed by more than 25% between the prior year and the current year.
United States
10736

Title II Allocation of Funds

Share and percent of funds for different Title II activities

Source: Title II-A Use of Funds District Survey (EDE File Specifications T2USESHR AND T2USEPCT)

Title II Types of Professional Development (PD)

Of districts funding [Subject] PD, percent by type of PD

Source:  Title II-A Use of Funds District Survey (EDE File Specification T2DTYPE)

Title II Topics of Professional Development (PD)

Of districts funding [Subject] PD, percent by topic of PD

Source: Title II-A Use of Funds District Survey (EDE File Specification T2PDTOP)

Data Dictionary
No data notes found
No data notes found

Displaying 1 - 3 of 32


Filter by relevant graph
Relevant Graph Type of information Reference Term Description
Title II Allocation of Funds, Title II PD Topics, Title II PD Types Program Description Title II, Part A (Title II-A) Title II, Part A (Title II-A) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) is the key statute through which the federal government provides funds to states and districts to improve the quality and effectiveness of their teachers, principals, and other school leaders. For more information, see https://www.everystudentsucceedsact.org/title-ii- or https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-formula-grants/school-support-and-accountability/essa-legislation-table-contents/title-ii-part-a/#TITLE-II-PART-A
Title II Allocation of Funds, Title II PD Types, Title II PD Topics Data Source Description Title II LEA Survey District surveys were administered to a nationally representative sample of 5,491 local educational agencies (typically school districts) in the spring and summer of 2021. The district sample included enough districts in each state to permit state-level estimates of district uses of Title II-A funds and also included a nationally representative sample of 500 charter school districts. Puerto Rico and Hawaii have singie school districts and are excluded from the LEA analyses. For more information on the methodology, please refer to Appendix A in the full report at https://oese.ed.gov/files/2022/08/SY-20-21.pdf
Title II Allocation of Funds Graph Description Title II Allocation of Funds This graph provides two different metrics: The bar displaying 'percent of districts' is demonstrating the percentage of districts that chose to spend some of their Title II funds on that particular activity. Across the activities, the sum of these bars can equal greater than 100%. The bar displaying 'share of funds' demonstrates how districts distributed the funds across the activities. The sum of these bars across activities should equal 100%.